Saturday, September 15, 2007

Paul McCartney's latest...

I just finished a first-listen to Paul McCartney's new album, "Memory Almost Full." I had read many laudatory reviews, but I was prepared to be let down. To the contrary, this is certainly the best album Paul has made, sans the Beatles. Here is a review that says exactly what I would have to say on the subject.

The review is spot on about Paul's ruminations on his mortality and that of others. Here are the lyrics for the last track on the album "The End of the End." I'm sorry you can't hear the wonderful tune that Paul wrote for this, but "stories of old to be rode on like carpets that children have played on" should give you an idea of just how good it is.

At the end of the end
It's the start of the journey
To a much better place, and this wasn't bad
So a much better place would have to be special
No need to be sad

On the day that I die
I'd like jokes to be told
And stories of old to be rode on like carpets
That children have played on
And laid on while listening to stories of old

At the end of the end
It's the start of the journey
To a much better place, and this wasn't bad
So a much better place would have to be special
No reason to cry

On the day that I die
I'd like bells to be rung
And songs that were sung to be laid out like blankets
That lovers have played on and laid on
While listening to songs that were sung

At the end of the end
It's the start of the journey
To a much better place,
And a much better place would have to be special
No reason to cry
No need to be sad
At the end of the end
The other tracks are all terrific too. Wonderful song writing, super arrangements, kick-ass musicians and singers, and flawless engineering. Oh, and did I say that Paul's singing hasn't lost anything.

Tom gives this one a big thumbs up.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

A dose of reality...

On September 1st I was at the football game between my beloved Cal Bears and Tennessee. The game was completely sold out, which meant that there were over 75,000 people in the stadium. While looking at this crowd, it made me think about how small it looked when I equated it to military troops. I thought "what if twice this number of soldiers had to conquer, pacify, and then hold THE ENTIRE STATE OF CALIFORNIA?!"

Thinking about it in those terms really brought the Iraq fiasco home for me. According to the World Atlas, Iraq consists of 166,859 square miles. The same source sizes California at 155,959, only slightly smaller than Iraq. I pictured a mere two stadiums full of guys having to take care of the entire state of California. Impossible! Sure we could send 100,000 heavily armed troops into Los Angeles and environs and quell unrest in that area, but then what happens if the insurgents conduct other operations in the San Francisco Bay area, or Sacramento, or they set up operations in the foothills around the cities ? We would only have less than a stadium full of guys around to deal with the entire state, because we would have a stadium-and-a-half of soldiers committed to Los Angeles.

Sound familiar?

~ Tom

Monday, September 10, 2007

Pat Buchanan on invading Iran

I've been into politics all my life. My late father followed politics avidly until his death in 2000 at age 80. One guy that he and I both liked, even though we disagreed with way more than half of what he espouses, is Pat Buchanan. We respected him because he is smart, loyal, and consistent in his beliefs, not to mention being a true fighting Irish Catholic. Dad was not Catholic, but I think he had a true respect for Catholics who "walked the walk" rather than just "talking the talk."

Anyway, I was watching last Friday's McLaughlin Group, (which I had TIVO'd), a show that Dad and I often watched together. Pat is a regular on that show. Pat pointed out that after the Petraeus testimony, the Democrats are not going to be able to do anything to really stop Bush and the neocons. Next, he predicted that near the end of the month, they will begin a huge push to attack Iran. You may not know or remember that Pat was one of the most vocal critics of the Iraq war, so his prediction on Iran was not coming from joy and support, but was coming out of true fear and concern that Bush, Cheney and the neocons are bound and determined to mix it up militarily with Iran while they still have the chance.

Coming from Buchanan, this is really scary. I truly believe that he knows what he is talking about. Eleanor Clift pretty much agreed with Pat, but pointed out that Bush would need a separate approval from Congress to do it. Pat countered by saying he did not believe that Bush believed he was constrained. Eleanor replied by noting that if Bush and his neocon hoard were stupid enough to bomb or invade Iran, impeachment was sure to follow. Pat was not given time to respond, but I could tell from the look on his face that he sincerely believes that these bozo's are going to have their way come hell or high water.

It could be that Pat is trying to prevent a move against Iran by firmly predicting it's going to happen, which of course sends guys like me into a frenzy. I'm really hoping that's his angle here.

~ tom

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Quote for today...

Trickle-down economics results in a nation of "pee-on's"

~ Thom Hartman on his radio show this morning.

Eat your hearts out!



50th Monterey Jazz Festival coming soon!


Posted by Picasa

The Lookout

I like movies that stick with you for a while -- especially ones that get better the next day as you think about them. "The Lookout" is one of those kind of flicks. Richard Roeper of Ebert & Roeper has picked it as his number one movie of the year so far.

Don't let it slip through the cracks. Rent the DVD and enjoy. It's worth it.

~ tom

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

A Draconian Secenario

I was just now listening to Marjorie Cohn on Thom Hartman's show - she is president of the National Lawyers Guild and has authored a book on the criminality of the Bush administration.

Anyway, she and Thom had each heard the following rumor within the past couple of hours:

Bush appoints Joe Lieberman as Attorney General. The Senate, which always confirms its own, confirms Joe.

The Connecticut Governor, who is a Republican gets to appoint a successor to Joe, who will no doubt be a Republican.

This tips the Senate back to the Republicans, which stops all these investigations and further investigations. It also puts in place an Attorney General who is a Bush lackey and who has stated that he thought Gonzalez was being too conservative when he said the Geneva Convention was "quaint."

Hmmmm...

~ tom